This legislation, the first of its kind in South Asia, was developed through a transparent process that includes several rounds of stakeholder consultations, with draft versions made available for public comment since June 2019 under the purview of the Ministry in charge of Digital Infrastructure
Subsequently, the Personal Data Protection Bill was first published as a draft bill in 2019. It was further subject to several rounds of stakeholder consultations and revisions, and subsequently was passed by the Parliament of Sri Lanka on 19 March, 2022 as the ‘Personal Data Protection Act No. 9 of 2022’ (“PDPA”).
The PDPA is primarily inspired by the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) and, therefore, shares many similarities with the GDPR.
Although certified by the Speaker of Parliament, except for Part V of the PDPA which deals with provisions relating to the regulator under the law, i.e. the Data Protection Authority, the PDPA is yet to become operative as it provides for different time periods within which certain parts of the law would come into force, allowing controllers and processors a much-needed grace period.
The PDPA applies both territorially to the processing of personal data where such processing takes place wholly or partly within Sri Lanka, or by a person or entity within Sri Lanka; and extraterritorially, in so far as a person or entity outside Sri Lanka provides goods or services to individuals within Sri Lanka or monitors the behaviour of individuals within Sri Lanka.
With the provisions of the PDPA itself, the majority of the law will come into operation within 18 to 36 months from the 19 March, 2022, while the part governing the sending of marketing messages using personal data (Part IV) would become operative within 24 to 48 months from the 19 March, 2022.
An order has been gazetted by the President as the Minister of Technology bringing in the Part V of the PDPA into operation on 17 July, 2023.
Through another Extraordinary Gazette issued by the President as the Minister of Technology by virtue of the powers vested in him by the PDPA, and the Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, the following dates have been notified for the operationalization of the PDPA:
As per the latest Gazette Notification, the PDPA will be fully operational and enforced, commencing March 18, 2025.
Sri Lanka until recently did not have legislation pertaining to protection of data and privacy, although different sector specific laws such as the Computer Crimes Act No. 24 of 2007, the Banking Act No. 30 of 1988, the Electronic Transactions Act No. 19 of 2006, the Right to Information Act No. 12 of 2016 and the Telecommunications Act No. 25 of 1991 recognize the need for privacy and confidentiality. Identifying this lacuna, the Personal Data Protection Bill was first published as a draft bill in 2019. It was subject to several rounds of revisions, and subsequently was passed by the Parliament of Sri Lanka on 19 March, 2022 as the Personal Data Act No. 9 of 2022 (“PDPA”).
Although certified by the Speaker of Parliament, except for Part V of the PDPA which deals with provisions relating to the regulator under the law, i.e. the Data Protection Authority, the PDPA is yet to become operative as it provides for different time periods within which certain parts of the law would come into force, allowing controllers and processors a much-needed grace period. The majority of the law will come into operation within 18 to 36 months from the 19 March, 2022, while the part governing the sending of marketing messages using personal data would become operative within 24 to 48 months from the 19 March, 2022. With regard to Part V, it should be noted that an order has been issued by the Minister of Technology which provides that the said Part V of the PDPA has been brought into operation on 17 July, 2023. Accordingly, the Data Protection Authority is now in the process of being established, upon the completion of which the other parts of the PDPA are expected to follow suit.
The PDPA is primarily inspired by the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) and, therefore, shares many similarities with the GDPR.
The PDPA applies both territorially to the processing of personal data where such processing takes place wholly or partly within Sri Lanka, or by a person or entity within Sri Lanka; and extraterritorially, in so far as a person or entity outside Sri Lanka provides goods or services to individuals within Sri Lanka or monitors the behaviour of individuals within Sri Lanka.
The PDPA requires controllers and processors which are not public authorities to appoint a Data Protection Officer (“DPO”) where their core activities consist of:
The PDPA permits a group of entities to appoint a single DPO provided, however, such DPO is easily accessible by all of the group entities.
Such DPO is required to be a competent individual possessing academic and professional qualifications in matters relating to data protection.
The specific responsibilities of the DPO as per the PDPA includes:
Similar to the GDPR, the PDPA enshrines certain principles governing the collection and processing of personal data. Each controller must ensure that personal data is processed in compliance with such principles, which are as follows.
In order to ensure that processing is ‘lawful’ whenever personal data is processed, such processing should be based on the most appropriate legal basis out of the following grounds provided under the PDPA:
In addition to the aforesaid lawful grounds, if processing special categories of personal data, a controller is required to satisfy one of the following additional conditions, on the objective basis of being most appropriate:
In addition to the aforesaid lawful grounds, if processing special categories of personal data, a controller is required to satisfy one of the following additional conditions, on the objective basis of being most appropriate:
Transparency is an important principle enshrined in the PDPA and, as stated above, it aims to ensure that data subjects are aware of how their personal data is processed and understand their rights pertaining to such data.
Accordingly, the PDPA requires controllers to provide detailed information to data subjects in a concise, transparent, intelligible and easily accessible form. Therefore, providing the following information to data subjects at the point of collection of their personal data is imperative, which can be fulfilled by the provision of a privacy notice:
In addition, when a controller intends to process personal data for a new purpose, a data subject must be informed of such further processing, providing them with the information set out above.
If in any event personal data is collected via means other than direct collection from the data subject, the above information should be provided to the data subject within one month or at the time of the first communication to that data subject or when the personal data is first disclosed to another recipient, whichever event occurs first.
The PDPA provides a series of rights for data subjects, largely similar to that of the GDPR. A controller must respond to any written request made by a data subject pertaining to his rights within 21 working days of receiving the request.
Right to access personal data: data subjects have the right to access their personal data, be provided with confirmation as to whether such personal data has been processed and be provided a copy of such personal data by submitting a written request.
Right to withdraw consent: if processing is based on consent, the data subject has the right to withdraw such consent at any time and the right to request a controller to refrain from further processing of the data subject’s personal data, provided the processing was based on the data subject’s consent.
Right to object to processing: data subjects have the right to object to further processing beyond the original purpose for which it was collected where such processing is based on the grounds of legitimate interests or public interest.
Right to rectification or completion: data subjects have the right to request a controller to rectify or complete any personal data that is inaccurate or incomplete.
Right to request a review of automated decisions: a data subject has the right to request for a review of a decision made by a controller based solely on automated processing which is likely to create “an irreversible and continuous impact on the rights and freedoms of the data subject” under Sri Lankan law, unless such automated processing is:
A controller is permitted to refuse to a request of a data subject based on the above rights only in limited instances, having regard to the following:
he PDPA allows for cross-border data flow and the processing of data in a third country outside Sri Lanka, subject to the parameters set out in the PDPA.
In case of a public authority acting as a controller or a processor, such transfer should only be made to a third country prescribed pursuant to an adequacy decision. The Minister in charge of the subject matter has the power to make an adequacy decision in consultation with the Authority, and factors such as the relevant written laws and the enforcement mechanisms available in such third country will be considered in making such an adequacy decision.
A controller or processer that is not a public authority may also process personal data in a third country subject to an adequacy decision. If no adequacy decision has been made, personal data may be transferred to such third country only where the controller or processor effecting such transfer is able to ensure compliance with the obligations imposed under Part I, II and sections 20 to 25 of the PDPA by the imposition of appropriate safeguards. The transferor effecting such transfer is required to adopt an instrument that may be specified by the Authority in order to ensure compliance with the provisions of the PDPA by the transferee.
It is noteworthy that no such adequacy decisions have been made yet, considering the fact that the majority of the law is yet to become operative.
In the absence of an adequacy decision or appropriate safeguards, the PDPA provides the following limited instances where personal data could still be transferred to a third country (provided that the transferor in such instance is not a public authority):
Many definitions in the PDPA are similar to that of the GDPR. In particular:
“Personal data” is defined to mean any information by which a data subject may be identified, either directly or indirectly by referring to an identifier or one or more factors specific to that individual. Thus, a name of a person is not a necessity for data to constitute personal data, but any factor such as an identification number, financial data, location data or an online identifier or factors specific to the physical, physiological, genetic, psychological, economic, cultural or social identity of that individual that allows for the tracing of him / her, would constitute personal data under the PDPA.
The PDPA further identifies a category of personal data as “special categories of personal data” with a view of protecting more sensitive personal data which are at a higher risk of adversely affecting an individual in the event such data is exploited. Special categories of personal data are defined to include personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, genetic data and biometric data, data concerning health or a natural person’s sex life or sexual orientation, personal data in relation to offences, criminal proceedings and convictions or personal data relating to a child.
The term ‘processing’ has been rendered an extremely wide meaning within the PDPA to include (but not be limited to) collection, storage, preservation, alteration, retrieval, disclosure, transmission, making available, erasure, destruction of, consultation, alignment, combination, or the carrying out of logical or arithmetical operations on, personal data.
The PDPA places extensive obligations on controllers of personal data. A ‘controller’ is defined to include any natural or legal person / entity which determines the purposes and means of processing personal data. When two or more controllers jointly determine the ways and means of processing personal data, the PDPA identifies them as joint controllers.
A ‘processor’ on the other hand is any natural or legal person / entity which processes personal data on behalf of the controller.